Home
 
 
03 July 2009 @ 08:06 pm
SyFy rhymes with Iffy  
I watch the SciFi channel all the time. Lately they've been running ads about how they're changing the name of the channel form SciFi to Syfy. At the off, it seems like a ridiculous thing to do, and seems even more ridiculous (and insulting to their audience) when I looked up just why they're changing the name.

In a re-branding move, the SciFi channel is aiming to lose their "geeky" image by renaming the network Syfy. That name was chosen out of three hundred different possibilities, because it sounds the same as the old name, but also supposedly distances itself from Science Fiction and allows them to branch out into new genres and attract new audiences, especially young "tech savvy" people and women.

"The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network."

One of the comments on the article said this, and I agree with it:

"Thank you, idiotic executives, for finally making overt what your programming choices have implied for years: that you hate your core audience.

I might (and I emphasize might) have considered watching the new channel, despite it's absurd and meaningless name. Not, however, after I read this article. It's full of quotes that are not only stupid, but actively insulting to the very people who should be your most loyal supporters.

You continue to perpetuate the very stereotypes from which you wish to distance yourselves. Instead of acknowledging what the literary and academic worlds have known for at least two decades, that SF is more than just "space, aliens[,] and the future," you'd rather continue to sucker audiences in with lowest-common-denominator drivel and derivatives of ideas that intelligent audiences were calling inane ten years ago.

Thank you for letting me know that I am not welcome in your new, hip channel. If you need me, I'll be spending my money in my local bookstore, exploring the real, thought-provoking cutting edge of SF.

-- Jason Ramboz"


It makes me wonder just how stupid they imagine women are. It's like their old ad campaign for Battlestar Gallactica which promoted the show as sci-fi that women can like, as if no woman has ever enjoyed a science fiction television show before. It's especially insulting to a woman like me, who grew up on SciFi and genre in general. A cheap re-branding of the network name is not what's going to draw anyone to the network. What draws people to a network is good programming.

Dave Howe, advertising executive for the channel said “It made us feel much cooler, much more cutting-edge, much more hip, which was kind of bang-on what we wanted to achieve communication-wise.”

Well, you know what, Dave Howe? FUCK YOU.

___________________________

EDIT: [info]studyofrunning has posted her own response at her journal. If you're interested, that's worth a read as well.

 
 
Mood: infuriated
 
 
( 8 notes — Post a new comment )
Zigfried Farnon: Reoccuring dreams.[info]bonamoz on July 4th, 2009 04:38 am (UTC)
Yeah, I read about that a few days ago. It's a lame move on their part. I also read something to the extent of: they couldn't trademark the "SciFi" name, or something - and that was another factor in the renaming.

I still hold dear the neat-o light up "SciFi Channel" pen they sent me in exchange for my angsty letter about how I thought they were crap for not playing Red Dwarf, like, ten years ago.

They always cancel anything I like on that station, anyway, so I don't watch it too often. Actually, I think the only things I ever watch on there are The Twilight Zone and Sarah Jane. :-/

D: DW - Victoria[info]notusachan on July 4th, 2009 05:11 am (UTC)
... So first there are no girls on the internet and now there are no girls who like science fiction?


WELL DAMN, GUESS I DON'T EXIST TWICE OVER NOW. FML.
studyofrunning[info]studyofrunning on July 4th, 2009 05:14 am (UTC)
Oh WTF. I'd stop watching them, but I did that ages ago after they canceled most of my favorite shows prematurely, dragged another out painfully, and cut bits out of their versions of Doctor Who.

There was a bit of a rant here, and then I decided there was so much I needed to say that I should just make my own post about it. But yes, as a woman, gamer, sci-fi fan, and person who enjoys pronouncing their name "skiffy", I find this highly offensive. And so should everyone else. I hope their many identical vaguely-futuristic action-soaps all get miserable ratings.
&i: time • I'm sorry - what the fuck?[info]riverdresses on July 4th, 2009 08:19 am (UTC)
"The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network."

OKAY. In just one breath, that offends me to the point of LITERAL rage & not to mention half of some amazingly fun females I know who enjoy a LOT of sci-fi. I mean . . . dude, I was going to say 'Have these fuckers not looked at HOW many girls are playing so-called 'geeky games' & watching science-fiction nowadays', but it's a painfully obvious answer - none. Or, if they were presented with them, they just ignored them.

It makes me wonder just how stupid they imagine women are. It's like their old ad campaign for Battlestar Gallactica which promoted the show as sci-fi that women can like, as if no woman has ever enjoyed a science fiction television show before. It's especially insulting to a woman like me, who grew up on SciFi and genre in general.

Having not seen any Battlestar Galactica, or any adverts for it, DID THEY REALLY FUCKING PROMOTE IT LIKE THAT? Because that? Is just a complete WHAT THE FUCK moment. I too grew up watching a lot of sci-fi (mostly Star Trek, actually!), but if it wasn't for watching American-created sci-fi, I never would have gone on to British sci-fi.

Which is a thought I just had - is this how AMERICAN programming executives look at their demographics, or do they do this in the UK as well? It doesn't seem like they do in the UK, just from what I've seen - Doctor Who is practically an ICON there, like Star Trek is here, so I'd imagine they wouldn't - that they'd target ALL their sci-fi shows to all audience, not just one particular demographic. But I don't know for sure, I'm just speculating.

Well, they wouldn't be getting my viewing time anyway - I prefer British television now anyway & I have all my wanted sci-fi on DVD or my hard drive. (& they need to stop taking bits out of Doctor Who when they DO air it - fuck this 'commercial placement' bollocks. I WANT A FULL EPISODE.)
Becca[info]sweet_panda on July 4th, 2009 06:54 pm (UTC)
I think it sounds like syphillis for the eyes.

REALLY they could get my attention with fewer absolutely crap movies that are trying to be good. Don't get me wrong, I like crap movies. I just really like the ones that know they're crap and just immerse themselves in the crap experience.

Too many large breasted women getting eaten by men in gillysuits for me, thanks.

And not in the fun, spanky way, either.
vrrrrt: DW: Three Fail[info]vrrrrt on July 5th, 2009 09:27 am (UTC)
Gahhhh. Fuck them, indeed. When I did have SciFi, a large proportion of the shows seemed absolutely terrible, anyway.
Don't follow in my footsteps; I run into walls.: well[info]ulalume_42 on July 6th, 2009 08:27 am (UTC)
Apparently these people have never been to their own conventions, and seen how many fangirls were in attendance.

The problem is, is that many people see the word "geek" as a bad thing- yet without geeks, there would be no computers, no scientific discoveries!

I feel as though I should close with a witty remark, but I'm too tired to think of anything. :/
Not meant to be taken seriously.: fraser can reprimand me anytime[info]maypanic on July 7th, 2009 03:37 pm (UTC)
I mostly stopped watching skiffy when they made WWF part of their core programming - because while it may be fiction, it sure as heck ain't science. They further alienated me with their animated ads that cover a third of the screen during programs, since 20 minutes of adverts out of every hour just isn't enough.

But insulting my entire gender, by not only failing to understand what appeals to us, but also that we can be fooled by making the name "cuter" ? Complete fail.